SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ruffian who wrote (51836)11/27/1999 12:45:00 PM
From: JohnG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Ruffian. For me, I can't tell. Q would do well to rise above it and help all. With possible simi infinite demand, there do not have to be two sides--at least not now--so appease Ericy and try to hold them in the fold and hopefully CSCO will accept a "this year" well developed technology over an R&D program. Time pressure is Q's friend.
JohnG



To: Ruffian who wrote (51836)11/27/1999 12:53:00 PM
From: marginmike  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
There are no lines to draw. The mighty Q supplies the weapons(HDR, CDMA, WK) and let the equiptement makers fight it out. We no longer need to pick sides!



To: Ruffian who wrote (51836)11/27/1999 2:30:00 PM
From: Caxton Rhodes  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 152472
 
Yes Ruff, but it's a fork, not a line:

csco-ericy
qcom<
Lu

Caxton



To: Ruffian who wrote (51836)11/27/1999 3:19:00 PM
From: llwk7051@aol.com  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Ruffian, Jacobs has stated recently that he sees csco as a customer. Ericy alliance only reinforces that position.
robert