SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles R who wrote (81206)11/27/1999 3:00:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 1574070
 
Charles,
RE:"

<So you are saying OEMs can get low speed chips and they say they
can't get high speed chips from Intel. No wonder they aren't happy. <G>
>

Did you miss a "not" in the first part of the sentence? It sounds like that.
Just to clarify:"...

My mistake...I mean't to say OEMs CAN'T get low speed chips....
Sorry...

Hey, they can get some from AMD can't they? <G>

Actually, I do agree with you...I think Intel wanted to force ASPs higher and eliminate lower speed chips but the demand is very, very high due to the "free/chip" PC concept that is usually tied to the $400 Prodigy internet rebate. Pretty obvious that Celerons and lower speed P-IIIs are flying off they shelf. Eliminating the P-III-450 probably didn't go over too well with OEMs...not to mention the reniging by Intel of the Celeron rebate deal. I really think Intel got nervous about sending that $50 check with each Celeron. <G>...Especially when they had no high speed Floppermines to take up the slack...
Jim