Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Green who wrote (35296)	11/27/1999 4:35:00 PM
From: Brian1970	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

See post 35292. Hasn't this article already been talked about on this thread? Barrons is not my barometer. I don't think they have their finger on anyone's pulse -- anyone who is alive. Just because the author revisits the delays of past, so what? And what exactly is he reporting about Rambus' display at Comdex? I can't tell from the article. Is he saying that the tech was on display at the booth, or that it was not on display at the booth? He says neither. He only mentions the booth, then goes on to talks about the past delays in rmbs' history. I don't know what that means. And even if the tech wasn't on display, but the ideas alone were presented, does that mean that rmbs won't be the standard? I don't think it makes a compelling argument. And I've read so many posts on this thread where someone has found rmbs to be faster than ddr, and others that disagree, and agree, and disagree. I don't trust this one article to synthesize the entire body of opinion on rmbs' comparative benefits. So overall, I'm confused by the article, and by your reference to this article as some sort of answer to my confidence in holding rmbs stock... Please clarify.

To: Don Green who wrote (35296)	11/27/1999 9:33:00 PM
From: Victor Lazlo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Don as you know, Barrons promotes bearishness among their writers and stringers. Barrons has been bearish on the market for over 15 years; Abelson is chronically wrong; he should have been on food stamps a long time ago. The co's that get panned by Barrons feel no effect from it beyond a couple of trading days; investors place no importance on Barrons anymore. Apart from the raw data they report, they're actually irrelavent for their lousy record. Their ivory tower leaves them quite removed from reality. It is sad how inaccurate Barrons is. Victor