Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Kensington Resources Ltd. (V.KRT) * Diamond in the rough! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: heavylifter who wrote (4449)	11/27/1999 7:27:00 PM
From: tom eland	Respond to of 5206

Thanks Heavylifter for a timely and informing posting expanding on the reason for delays!!!!! tom

To: heavylifter who wrote (4449)	11/27/1999 8:28:00 PM
From: Bob Walsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5206

The article by Harvey Klatt - Staff Reporter raises an interesting question: Was this a screw-up or was it intentional? I have no knowledge of the facts and I am not attempting to accuse anyone but I believe that KRT owes it's shareholders the duty to thoroughly investigate why and how this happened. One result of the apparent under-reporting of the numbers and value of diamonds was to depress and keep depressed the price of KRT, thereby injuring shareholders. Another result was a delay of many years in producing diamonds from the Fort a la Corne diamond project thereby possibly reducing the quantity on the international market. Here the question is even if the Fort a la Corne diamond project was in high production would the output increase the international supply by any measurable amount?? Regards, Bob

To: heavylifter who wrote (4449)	11/30/1999 2:18:00 AM
From: billy miner	Respond to of 5206

My only question to Heavylifter is ...Why is the date on the article Sept 13th? Seems like a long time to hold onto an article like that. Why did it take so long to "materialize" on this thread. Hell, even Murry pointed it out on stockhouse. You guys wouldn't be playing with us would ya? bminer

To: heavylifter who wrote (4449)	11/30/1999 11:50:00 PM
From: Falcon095	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5206

Hello Heavylifter and Fellow CDNX Speculators: Yes, it was a great read. More "support" for the view that something STINKS BADLY! And, the same operator is doing the review. How many of you feel comfortable with that? After all, we are not talking about one small pipe here. We are all aware of the FALC's mind-boggling potential. There is too much at stake here - for all of the players!!! In my opinion, it's time to get the SIGNET group in. We need to "clean house" on the technical side - to really KICK SOME BUTT! After all these years, how many of you feel like a hamster running the wheel? FALCON095 P.S. I'm from Missouri on this one.