To: rupert1 who wrote (72785 ) 11/28/1999 12:59:00 AM From: Captain Jack Respond to of 97611
Vic-- I never have and expect no one else to kiss any butt. When I speak of WS it takes in everyone from the analysts, ibstitutions, and mom/pop investors. The SEC now demands all be treated the same,,, it seems MC said he was going to do something of that nature once. Plus-- I "demand" nothing as I have little faith in cpq or in getting even any longer. No I do not have tremendous faith in the qtr results. The strongest indication received was the raise in div,, not that it was a fortune but will effect the bottom line--- I think he suggested they can AFFORD a few perks,, then came the filing,,, the word guidence does not mean just the cool crap but the ugly stuff too. Guidence means something additional to cpq-- that is credability -- something EP / EM lost for cpq and if it is ever to be great needs to be brought back (earned) by honesty and being open. Actually it will take a lot of 'doing' before anyone automatically assumes cpq will do well in any qtr until they have proven themselves which will take some time,,, less time with a gain in credability. <<"I believe if he knew something good about 4Q and 1Q he would have said it by now.">> True,,, but we do not know if he knows things are on track or not,,, waiting until the numbers are out indicate he is clueless until handed the final results. As it was only a few months ago when it was stated this communications company had not integrated the DEC payroll and someother accounting procedures from DEC and overseas operations... this far into the qtr he should have a 'feel' for it and have preliminary reports.. if he cannot read them cpq do a better job of finding a cfo than than they did a ceo... MC deserves this qtr I guess,,, but time is up then,,, he needs a cfo and to produce some guidence good or bad to all shareholders... the only ones he can count on are the little guys as evidenced by the institutional exodus EP/EM caused...