SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Corner Bay Silver (BAY.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scripts who wrote (492)11/28/1999 5:00:00 PM
From: Mark Bartlett  Respond to of 4409
 
Ed,

I think they give a reasonable indication -- but a much broader based sampling process, in terms of sample location, leach times, ore type, grinding requirements (if any) etc. will really tell the tale of the tape.

If they come in @ 70% Ag recovery, we are in business, big time - and lets not forget there is a good chance they will continue to expand the size of the ore body, especially to the north and N/W .... to the south is the wild card.

MB



To: Scripts who wrote (492)11/28/1999 7:06:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4409
 
ED,

A hard question to answer..here is why.

The test indicates so far that the recoveries are higher when higher grade is processed. The Bottle Roll tests gave these indications:

1) High Grade ore above 75 meters: 74% silver recoveries
2) High Grade ore below 75 meters: 70% " "
3) Low Grade ore above 75 meters: 67% " "
4) Low Grade ore below 75 meters: 58%

The average of these 4 tests is 67% (gold is 89%) which average to 70% silver equivalent. And this is the number that has been used in all analysis.

But you will notice that the deposit is primarely high grade and that the average silver grade is probaly between 70-74%. The company is conservative in taking 70%, because these tests are small scaled and used chips from RC drilling.

I feel (hope) that the average should come very near 70%.

Claude