Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LTBH who wrote (16448)	11/28/1999 7:14:00 PM
From: Pallisard	Respond to of 27311

Networm, you're echoing questions we've asked of Larry many times, and which he even asks, rhetorically I think, of himself. "The question is, where does one make money looking forward? At $10 and based on what we know right now, VLNC is not my choice." [My response] Then why are you here?.... ......if you're not looking for an entry point and you're not invested, then you shouldn't even be wasting your or anyone else's time here. You seem to be bent on finding reasons why one shouldn't invest in Valence instead of defining parameters for which one should. My point, Networm, is that his posts all seem to be deconstructive. I'm still convinced that he is a part of a short coalition which, in concert with Castle Creek, tried to ruin Valence's ability to secure financing earlier in the year. To me, everything he says about his history with Valence is probably pure fiction. I don't believe he ever has or intends to be a long investor in Valence. Of course this is my opinion.

To: LTBH who wrote (16448)	11/28/1999 7:23:00 PM
From: LTBH	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

OT Reply to Richard Reardon From: Richard C. Reardon Sunday, Nov 28 1999 6:39PM ET ..I wrote: .."Small Potatoes = VERY Cost Sensitive ..I have a very small pocketbook, but I would like to have ..a "potentially" new technology stock in my holdings. This ..unfortunately limits me to small dollar stocks like VLNC. The ..purchase price also makes a significant difference for me, whether ..I buy 300 shares at $7 or..." He Wrote: ....Then what's with your interest in Tyco (a $40 per share stock)? Rather a confrontational message and certainly not informative but I'll answer ya anyway. Most good tech stocks are running 100 to 300 per share, out of my league. The ULBIs and VLNCs are not at 3 or 5 or 7 or 10 per share but are pure speculation approached with caution and at the cheapest cost. As to TYC, I don't view this as a tech stock, don't think many others do either, it's a good conglomerate which at 36 per share was a bargain and is a good holding. I do own 100 shares of TYC. Certainly don't think this contradicts my statement that my pockets aren't deep! I also make a big distinction between TYC and VLNC, maybe you don't. Hope this satisfies your curiosity Richard. TO THE REST OF THE THREAD: Have I somehow been rude thereby causing this type of message?? Is this person known to the thread?? Networm