Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael who wrote (51917)	11/28/1999 11:29:00 PM
From: Jon Koplik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Michael (and all) -- thank goodness people cannot escape from the "audit trail" of their previous posts on SI ! Jon.

To: Michael who wrote (51917)	11/29/1999 8:07:00 AM
From: Poet	Respond to of 152472

michael, I appreciate your digging into Mr. Lee's posting record, but I take exception to "as we all know not everyone post the full truth on internet message boards" Since when has "posting the full truth" about Gregg Powers' identity helped this message board? Careful about throwing stones when the house you've constructed is made of glass.

To: Michael who wrote (51917)	11/29/1999 8:28:00 AM
From: Wyätt Gwyön	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

I looked at James Lee's posts and discern no nefarious plot. The mile-wide paragraph margin in his pdQ post should make it pretty obvious that he's just learning his way around SI. Remember, lots of newcomers get concerned about IDC, and if you go to the telecomstocks.com site without some prior knowledge, you might get kind of alarmed. Lots of TA types call for all sorts of crazy pullbacks--BIG DEAL. Also, some people actually think NOK is an OK company and not the fount of all evil, so the fact that he posted on the NOK board is not prima facie evidence giving you a carte blanche to apply the old flamethrower. Take it easy on the guy!

To: Michael who wrote (51917)	11/29/1999 3:47:00 PM
From: James M Lee	Respond to of 152472

Michael: 1. I was not on the NOK thread. 2. I simply ask a question about IDC (I apparently wrongly assumed that's one of the reasons for these boards). 3. At the time I said support for QCOM was around 250 it had run nonstop from 220 to 400 in a matter of days. Support was in fact around 250. 4. I bought the Qualcomm SmartPhone and could not read the Palm 3 screen. This is not an uncommon complaint about the Palm 3 (not Qualcomm). 5. Lastly, one of the reasons I read the SI boards is to get other folks opinions about whatever. I don't want nor expect everyone to agree with one another. This is how I learn! You on the other hand appear to need agreement. A nice way to potentially compound ignorance.