SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rarebird who wrote (45378)11/29/1999 7:47:00 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 116764
 
More against the WTO:
Subject: WTO n the De-synchronization of the Global Econ
Author: i dunno any more (tao.ca)
Date: 11-29-1999 02:48

STRATFOR.COM Global Intelligence Update
November 29, 1999

The WTO and the De-synchronization of the Global Economy

Summary:

The World Trade Organization (WTO) is meeting in Seattle this week. The
participants are so divided that they could not even develop a formal
agenda for the meetings. While everyone is focused on China's admission,
the fact is that the WTO is moribund, only a few years after its creation.
Its failure is rooted in the fundamental reality of today's global
economy: de-synchronization of regions of roughly equal bulk. Ever since
the Asian meltdown, the world's economic regions have been completely out
of synch. Indeed, individual nations within regions are out of synch. That
means that the creation of integrated economic policies is impossible.
What helps one region hurts others. Thus, organizations like the WTO
cannot function. Instead, regional institutions are emerging. The,y too,
face conflict among constituent nations, but are more likely to create
coherent and beneficial policies for their regions. This points to
increased tension among and within regions. Such de- synchronization has
been seen in the past. It is, over the course of a generation, a warning
of the potential for serious international conflict.

Analysis:

The World Trade Organization (WTO) will hold ministerial level meetings in
Seattle on Nov. 30. Representatives from 135 member countries and several
observer countries, including China, will gather. Demonstrators protesting
the effect of WTO policies on workers in the Third World will share space
with demonstrators protesting the effects of WTO policies on workers in
the advanced industrial countries. In fact, the demonstrations outside the
meeting halls will be more interesting than the discussions inside. This
is not to say that the demonstrations will be all that interesting.
Rather, the meetings inside the hall will be an exercise in near
irrelevance.

The purpose of the meetings is to kick off a new round of trade talks designed to increase free trade and reduce barriers to international trade. Preliminary talks in Geneva revealed such a sharp division among the 135 participant nations that it proved impossible to create an agenda for the meetings. In other words, the members were so divided that they couldn't even agree on what ought to be discussed. President Clinton, the host, sought to break the logjam by turning the meetings into a summit, on the theory that a summit would raise the political stakes and decrease the chances of a total breakdown. By last Wednesday, however, the president had abandoned his plans for a summit, claiming that the logistics were simply too complex. The fact was that few were willing to come.
(cont)
phorum.tao.ca



To: Rarebird who wrote (45378)11/29/1999 8:06:00 AM
From: IngotWeTrust  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116764
 
Curious as to how you arrived at your assessment that "[293.50] was below market expectations?"

Acc'd to whom?

Besides,
since the federal reserve has created the special Fed Window, for short gold CB's as well as arrogant producers, I'm surprised this one was "covered" at all...why bother?

O/49r



To: Rarebird who wrote (45378)11/29/1999 8:57:00 AM
From: Enigma  Respond to of 116764
 
Re: the auction result - and there are those here who think producers should not hedge? d