SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Ardnij who wrote (11402)11/29/1999 12:21:00 PM
From: StockHawk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Is QCOM showing us a wedge? A bit of TA speculation.

I've seen a few mentions recently in different places concerning QCOMs chart pattern. People are seeing a "decending wedge" or pennant formation. TA advocates believe that such formations can portend big moves up (but could also lead to a big move down). If anyone is interested I will provide some information, and an example of how this works below.

The essence of a pennant is that the stock moves up dramatically in a very short period of time - that vertical run forming a 'flag pole' on the chart. Then the stock moves sideways, its daily range getting narrower each day (forming the flag or pennant), as the stocks volume tapers off.

Take a look at this chart for JDSU

38.186.148.51

The flag pole is formed by the run from around $130 to $200, then a wedge-shaped pennant is formed over the next few days as the stock drops into the 190s and 180s. Ideally the pennant should be downward sloping, which it is in this case. Then the stock starts another dramatic run up, moving from the 190s to 260 or so. In the classic case, this second run is equal to the initial "flag pole" run.

Now look at QCOM

38.186.148.51

Notice the length of the pole, the recent pennant formation and the drop off in volume as the pennant formed. The last point on the chart may (just may) be the start of the second run.

StockHawk



To: Tom Ardnij who wrote (11402)11/29/1999 5:20:00 PM
From: DownSouth  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 54805
 
Tom, RE: BRCD. Could you cite the author's discussion about BRCD. I have been operating, perhaps wrongly, that BRCD in the fc arena was simply innovating on standards and unable to create IPR. Help me get this straight.

Thanks