Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HQ who wrote (16473)	11/29/1999 12:57:00 PM
From: John Curtis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

HellQat: I find myself in agreement with you as it relates to VLNC initial p.o.'s, etc.. Still, now the case proceeds to the next level. And that is, it is now the prosecutions job to prove to a judge, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that all the claimants say is true. It should be interesting. If nothing else VLNC continues to be at the heart of controversy, eh? No wonder management is so closed mouth about things. Course, the longer VLNC prolongs this action, and the more p.o.'s they can produce....well, perhaps it weakens in direct proportion the prosecutions case? If so, then me thinks it's in the prosecutions interests to move this case along as speedily as legal wrangling allows, and VLNC's attorneys job to make prosecution jump through every legal "hoop" along the way. Hmmmmm......I wonder if it'd be better all 'round just to settle and move on? Guess we'll just have to wait and see...Ohh, one thing, though. This news DOES settle, for me anyway, the reason for today's morning down-draft....Market's never like any mention of legal tussels, unless it's to state the tussel is over.... Regards! John~