Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (64072)	11/29/1999 2:10:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Bill: Do me a big favor and drop the whole thing. The "suspension" was rescinded once SI Bob had a chance to review the circumstances. LT has posted that I have been suspended multiple times which is, of course, untrue as I have posted in response. These "persons" show themselves for what they are with each post. You simply play into their exaggerated opinions of self worth by continuing to pursue the issue. The virtue of the dreaded one liner with such "persons" is obvious. JLA

To: Bill who wrote (64072)	11/29/1999 2:11:00 PM
From: Edwarda	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Bill, regardless of the style and tone of X's posting, I should not leap to the conclusion that she did anything to get him suspended. Since his suspension was rescinded, I really think that it is fruitless to speculate as to the identity of the complainant. Let's let it go, O.K.?

To: Bill who wrote (64072)	11/29/1999 2:13:00 PM
From: Constant Reader	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

Bill, X already said she had nothing to do with your friend's temporary suspension. Did you forget the post to you referenced below? Perhaps you should ask your friend what was the reason provided by SI for his suspension. Message 12086443

To: Bill who wrote (64072)	11/29/1999 6:06:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

what "team" oh do, do tell us- rather than just posting here on and on and on. WHO got JLA suspended? Not IIIII. I asked that his posts cravenly STEALING my posts over to feelies be removed. IF SI suspended him for that it wasn't due to ME. I would never ask anyone- no matter how juvenile, stupid, vindictive and harassing they were- to be suspended. I have said over and over again that I think suspension should only be done for physical threats, extreme intimidation etc etc (although lower thresholds should apply on the stock threads). But of course you live in an alternate universe where everything YOU say is correct. So I suppose none of this will get into that ossified lump of concrete between your ears you call a brain- but just in CASE- NO ONE HERE TRIED TO GET JLA SUSPENDED. OK idiot? The italicized part was incorrect- I did not know anyone "here" would have done such a thing. I would not have believed it. But that part and ONLY that part was factually incorrect. I stand by everything else.