Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DlphcOracl who wrote (15966)	11/30/1999 7:24:00 AM
From: Rande Is	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 57584

To everyone. . . .As I have said many times, I only predict what is not manipulated. DlphcOracl, I never called WTT. As to whether it is a buying opportunity or not. . . probably not, because shorts are still in control of it at this time. Back To Everyone: WTT was not hit with a sell-off. . .anybody thinking that these stocks simply sell off by coincidence when we pick them, needs to go back and read some books. It was attacked by short-sellers. Clearly. A stock under accumulation doesn't turn and quickly run lower than it opens. And market makers probably never switched off the "auto-execution" mode of the computers that take our trades. . . making this an easy stock for short-sellers to manipulate through their heavy positions and boxing tactics, which we have not used in the past. The difference in this group of short-sellers and say Anthony's group is this. . . first Tony's group is enormous by comparison. And second, Tony's group has the decency to announce their short-sell plays publicly. By doing this, the longs at least know WHO is playing it short, so they can ask why. . . much the same as a gunfighter sees who he is fighting or a defendant faces his accusers. And Tony plays short because of a true belief that the company is not worth their current valuation or is a scam. On stocks he believes has good potential, he plays long, too. Now this little group that plays against our picks, does not have the guts to expose themselves as to who they are. In a gunfight, these cowards would shoot us in the back. They never announce their plays publicly, but prefer to hide in their shame. If they were to post publicly, they would be mocked for playing against the PERSONS in the stock and not just against the STOCK itself. It is more like STEALING than trading. They don't care about valuation, just about making us look bad. And the motivation for such an act can only be envy, jealousy and fear. They envy the closeness of our group. They are jealous of our substantial winnings over the past year and they are afraid to face their own inadequacies, in light of our countless victories. So they are likewise afraid to show their faces [names?] publicly, lest we see them for the true losers in life they really are. That's why they choose to hide in the shadows and pounce on our picks. It is the same as the school-yard bully that must keep everyone down, so that he can feel bigger. . .yet the reason for his action is always the same. He truly feels inferior to everyone. . .and is often the first in his school to take his own life. So I ask for this little group to show itself publicly, so we can help to guide you to professional assistance before it is too late. If you persist on shooting us in the back, I will certainly set you up for the biggest fall of your life. . . ADSP was just an 8 bagger in a single day. I have played stocks that were 18 baggers. . . knowing full well that they would pop big when news was finally released. Consider this a threat. . .so that you know from where it came and you know that you were warned. Rande Is