Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (81518)	11/30/1999 9:16:00 AM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572159

<Your source obviously does not have clear visibility as to what's going on in the Coppemine program. I'm in a bad spot, because I can't get too specific for obvious reasons. I'll just keep saying it's crap..> PB, One part of your post is missing! You forgot to add "Otellini does not lie", "I trust Intel management", "I trust them forever",... or something like that. What's wrong with you, man? :) :) :) :) :)

To: Process Boy who wrote (81518)	11/30/1999 2:25:00 PM
From: Charles R	Respond to of 1572159

PB, <Your source is nowhere near Coppermine, is it?? > I have said this before. None of the folks I talk to about CuMine have are handss-on like you are. <your assertions above have inaccuracies. THAT IS WHAT'S BUGGING ME.> I know something is bugging you. You are a lot less relaxed of late. But, "inaccuracies"? - Are you fudging? My data is probably a couple of weeks old. My knowledge is second hand there are information delays. If things have become slightly better in the mean time I can understand. I am reporting what I hear. You can't say what you want to say - I can understand. But, if you have to say what someone else is posting is "crap" then I would back it up, if I were you. Or else, we could wait till the 800s reach production and one of us will have to grovel. <Who is this person, that is plainly believing they are violating their NDA to an unsympathetic source anyway? > This is interesting. You say an NDA is being violated but you say my sources are reporting crap. How can both these things be true? <Your source obviously does not have clear visibility as to what's going on in the Coppemine program> I have said this a few times before but again - I get it from people not as close to the fab as you are. So, they do not have the visibility you do. I understand that. <I'll just keep saying it's crap when I see you posting inaccuracies, and take the flames for not backing it up with specifics.> Sorry guy. I can understand - not a nice spot to be in. Chuck