Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (81521)	11/30/1999 12:20:00 PM
From: Goutam	Respond to of 1572619

Hi PB, "Intel's Stealth Performance" Ooops... I meant "Intel's Stealth Launches" However, attributing stuff to PB, that PB didn't post, is bullsht.* I'm sorry, I didn't mean to offend you. I just mentioned all the themes that were repeated over and over on this thread in the last year or so. Only thing that I can attribute to you is about Intel's product launches ;-) The remaining stuff I mentioned was from others and not from you. I just mentioned all those just to show how things have changed over the last 6 months or so. Regards, Goutama

To: Process Boy who wrote (81521)	11/30/1999 12:37:00 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572619

RE <<<I will defend anything I write here. I have been wrong, and I attempt to admit as much once determined. However, attributing stuff to PB, that PB didn't post, is bullsh*t.>>> PB, come on. You and the other intc longs, but specifically you, referred to the cumine as if it were the second coming (and no I will not pull up your posts to prove it to you). Clearly those posts were intended to blunt the euphoria on this thread over the Athlon. And now that you are being held accountable for these implied, messiah-like capabilities of cumine and its ability to thwart the Athlon, you become indignant....and claim this thread is being unreasonable. Sorry. You can't have it both ways. ted