Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Paramount Ventures & Finance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Just G who wrote (3460)	11/30/1999 5:45:00 PM
From: Mr. Oil	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4884

Why was $50,000 offered to Easton to cover expences IF they didn't have the money? That does not make sense. If they didn't have the money then they had no obligation to offer or pay any money to cover Easton's epences. If the deal was called off by Paramount even though Easton HAD the money they would have an obligation to pay Easton's expences. Then they would say we'll pay you $50,000 and you waive all rights to sue. I sure wish they would give you the truth for a change.