SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (81605)12/1/1999 10:38:00 AM
From: Bill Jackson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583848
 
Jim, RE: and has tightened its testing procedures to minimise
Sounds like they will be burning some chips. Such a procedure to test for that specific bug that is intermittent will certainly cut yields and slow the rate of shipping as they lose production in two ways.

Bill



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (81605)12/1/1999 12:38:00 PM
From: Charles R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583848
 
<an Intel representative has confirmed there is a problem with Coppermine processors and said the bug will be fixed in the next stepping >

Grind time. I wonder if this could be stressing PB out.

<Intel, he says, has discovered the root cause of the problem and has tightened its testing procedures to minimise problems. >

This gotto be a nightmare on the test and qual guys. Imagine all those folks trying to find out batch sensitivity and see which lots needs to be rescreened and testing to see if the screen works! No wonder there are still very very few CuMines out there and these new rumors about Dell.

P.S.: It is kind of ironic that I was saying just yesterday that companies don't tell the stockholders about problems until it is late. It is probably safe to say that a whole bunch of people in the info loop (employees, customer, competitors) were tinkering with INTC over the last few days.

P.P.S.: Intel's Q4 may now officially be shot unless they cancel December price cuts or unless there is some miracle else where in the organization (including the accounting department)



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (81605)12/1/1999 4:54:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583848
 
Jim, I like the way Intel refers to the erratum, that the CopperMines "seize up between power up and power down cycles."

Why not just say that Coppermine processors "seize up."

The fact that the erratum "happens rarely" is interesting. I mean, how often does a Coppermine "unseize" once it "seizes?"

And, they point out that there are "no math errors" while the Coppermine is sitting there doing nothing! Wow, thats impressive.

Petz