Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (81699)	12/1/1999 7:27:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572378

Re: "The numbers are somewhere within JC's news of the past week or so. www.jc-news.com/pc" Yes and they confirm that a 733MHz CuMine beats even a 750MHz Athlon without using prefetch instructions. So no more whining from those of you who claim Intel is using compiler tricks for even their SPECint95 scores. Clearly AMD's CuMine scores on their website are as phoney as you can get. jc-news.com Coppermine-733 specint_base95 = 32.8 Athlon-750 (on Irongate C6) specint_base95 = 32.5 Note: I left out the FP scores. Athlon wins there. EP