SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Randy Ellingson who wrote (85900)12/1/1999 9:14:00 PM
From: KeepItSimple  Respond to of 164684
 
>Just wondering how much of your optimism on PCLNB's share price is due
>to future profits, and how much is due to details of share availability,
>short count, etc.

It appears you have been away from the market for a few years. Let me fill you in on a few things:

Almost none of these companies will ever make a profit.

Most have no fundamentals whatsoever.

That doesn't matter.

Share price is all that matters, and as such it is the target of all corporate and analyst effort. A short squeeze is the "holy grail" for an internut stock, and whenever you see one, join in. If you don't buy a stock just because it is an obvious unprofitable sham of a company, you will not make any money in this market. This is the New Era.



To: Randy Ellingson who wrote (85900)12/1/1999 10:36:00 PM
From: Bill Harmond  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 164684
 
I don't know the remaining percentage Delta owns, and as part of the deal with the new carriers, each airline's ownership is "in line" with Delta's. There are also new warrants to Delta as part of Delta's agreement to sell off part of their stake and go along with opening the bidding.

I don't know what this arrangement spells for the other agencies, and I really don't think it matters.

The only reason I ever buy a stock is belief in fundamentals. The high short interest is a great indicator of sentiment and would be a terrific boost should a catalyst come along.



To: Randy Ellingson who wrote (85900)12/1/1999 11:50:00 PM
From: Bill Harmond  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
yahoo.cnet.com