Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Piffer OT - And Other Assorted Nuts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Pitera who wrote (8793)	12/1/1999 8:33:00 PM
From: wlheatmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 63513

NMPS's biggest risk is that it won't work. I don't think that will happen since they already have a product for detecting bladder tumor. Until more studies are done to prove that it will work for other tumors...it's a toss up. I will ask my urology colleagues to see if they have any knowledge of this bladder tumor detection kit. Yeah,,,I can see Tom picking up about 300 call options on RFMD...lol

To: John Pitera who wrote (8793)	12/1/1999 9:04:00 PM
From: Lost1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 63513

, How come no one has thought of this 10 years ago? John, what makes you think that this technology hasn't been around for decades. The Cancer conglomerate and all things related, which is vast and very powerful, have nothing to gain and everything to lose if a quick, inexpensive cure-all is developed. Exchange of data is just now, with the advent of the NET, becoming something that can not be suppressed. I hate to sound like a conspiracy kook, but these situations exist. Think of petroleum industry. If a guy came up with an engine that ran on salt water he'd be wearing cement sneakers before he had a chance to tell his wife about it. Did_you_hear_that?someone's_listening.com ps--the above statement is complete and utter BS..thank you