SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marcos who wrote (5130)12/1/1999 8:50:00 PM
From: Factfinder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7235
 
Has anyone heard any revised estimates on when they will complete the Messina feasability study?



To: marcos who wrote (5130)12/1/1999 10:34:00 PM
From: gemsearcher  Respond to of 7235
 
Hey Marcos.

I never called you radical. In short , I have been waiting for the second shoe to drop on Camafuca for what is now an inordinately long period of time. I trust CJ's judgement on matters relating to geology implicitly. If Camafuca proves to be a bust , it will be my mistake and , sadly , his legacy. He bet the farm (pun intended) once and got a second chance. Let's hope he's right.

In any event , SUF is and should be bigger than CJ and Camafuca. Give it time. But be prepared to watch it rocket when CC finishes. BWDIK.

Regards.



To: marcos who wrote (5130)12/2/1999 5:42:00 PM
From: crudestope  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7235
 
Dear Marcos,

I value the South African diamond interests at between $6 and $8 per share. The higher value applies if the Marsfontein underground mine proves economic.

Messina is worth at least $5 per share.

Camafuca anything up to $3 per share, but who knows, could be $5 or zero!

Throw in the Brazilian, Canadian and Australian prospects for nothing.

And what have you got?

A grossly undervalued company at $2.

Best wishes,

Crudestope.