Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kid Rock who wrote (64634)	12/3/1999 8:12:00 AM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 108807

MOB actions require police action Violent, criminal actions do require police action. Hopefully intelligent, targeted action. But suppression of basic constitutional rights like speech and assembly for 30,000 - 50,000 citizens because of the presence of a few hundred violent punks doesn't sound warranted to me. Should the wrong actions of 1% nullify the freedoms of the 99%? If 1% of the population of a city have illegal drugs in their homes, should the police have carte blanche to invade and search every home in the city? If 1% of the drivers out on Saturday night are intoxicated, should driving be banned for all? At any point in time it's likely 1% of the population are probably doing something wrong - speeding, drinking too much, doing dope, whatever. This shouldn't prevent the rest of us from being free. If i put on my DEATH to the NWO t-shirt Personally I think you ought to have to do at least a little more than wear a T-shirt with Death to "whoever" to get your head beat. But I'm an old softy.