Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : PERFUMANIA.COM . . PRFM . . .FOR LONGS ONLY -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (2460)	12/2/1999 5:43:00 PM
From: Rande Is	Respond to of 2489

Nice move for sure, Jack. Those valuations of PRFM based on PF are theoretical. For instance. . . SGI has shares of many companies. . . their CMGI alone should value the company up around 30 bucks as I recall, but the company sits around 8 or so. It is good to know valuations, but the stock market is never fair or accurate. . .it is mostly a popularity contest, based on the hope of future earnings. Rande Is

To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (2460)	12/3/1999 7:41:00 PM
From: Manly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2489

Hey Jack, I see they ran our PRFM down a bit today. I sometimes wonder about investors today? They become concerned that PRFM didn't run after it's earnings and have since bailed. I'm still confident that approaching the holiday season, we'll see some positive press about PRFM to get us headed over $4.00 again to stay. Just read the YHOO thread where shorters are saying they are staying until they plan on covering at $1.50 which makes me laugh. Trying to scare investors off a stock by this tactic is crazy with PRFM. I think all of us that are in this stock know that with any type of volume - we'll move quickly north. Then these same investors that sold earlier will chase this stock up for us. I'm happy to hold this one going into XMAS without worry. See Ya! Glenn