Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BGR who wrote (77759)	12/2/1999 5:38:00 PM
From: re3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

biz.yahoo.com

To: BGR who wrote (77759)	12/2/1999 5:39:00 PM
From: re3	Respond to of 86076

sg.dailynews.yahoo.com

To: BGR who wrote (77759)	12/2/1999 5:40:00 PM
From: pater tenebrarum	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86076

and you are? <ggg> seriously, you are quite wrong. Tice has a research outfit that does excellent work. obviously you are talking about someone you know very little about.

To: BGR who wrote (77759)	12/2/1999 5:54:00 PM
From: Cynic 2005	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

<<Mohan, but the Prudent Bear is hardly an authoritative source of Economic History. It only rhymes with your biases, perhaps.>> One more time you proved that you comment on stuff without even reading it. It was a quote from President Hoover's memoirs. Do you get that? Yes that matter rhymes with my "biases" alright. But it is a counter argument for your "biases." You often ask people to produce proof for basis of their argument while you continue to spew meaningless drivel with no supporting data. I still remember a few of your posts in which you are freely floating your opinions as facts and asking others for "data." ("a) Heinz, I have to ask for data on that one ... please take no offense." #reply-11560016; b) "since it seems that you want to ignore data and stick to your personal biases from anecdotal information I can understand why everything looks UFB to you." #reply-10016033; c) When I see something erroneous posted in a public forum, I believe that the proper response is to post a correction supported by data/research. Apparently, you believe that the proper response is to walk away. Well, let's agree to disagree? #reply-11684628) You bring to me a few factual errors from Tice's commentary to support your claim. If you can't do that, stop making a fool of yourself again and again. Also, can you prove to me that quotes in my previous post (from Prudent Bear commentary) are not from President Hoover's memoir?. Many a times you asserted your opinion that Feds have already learned from their mistakes and insist that the crisis is over due to dreft handling by the Fed. BTW, putting a "g" or a "vbg" won't turn venum in to honey. (I saw your reply to this post and I concluded it is completely waste of my time to talk sense to you. Unless it is a different subject altogether, you can expect no posts from me.)