Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (9296)	12/2/1999 11:49:00 PM
From: Jeff Mizer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9818

Ron you probably would have been a loyalist to the Bristish as that is what they thought of the colonist rabblerousers.... Jefferson and the like were alive today they would not be very happy with your globalist views either. Jefferson would have called for a tea party long ago. Look at the difficulty of federal beaurocracy dealing with 50 states and 275 million people... it will never work with a freedom styled gov't of over 6 billion people. Look at how nations are dividing now with ethnic wars and such- the world populace will not allow global gov't and of course Russia and esp. China will never go along unless it is a Solialist system and certainly not run by US ideals even if they are leftist US elites. The US population will not be the ones to stop global gov't -- it will be done overseas-- Americans can and are being duped into giving up Sovereignty but others will not be as easily. I don't much care to oppose world gov't as I am one hoping to be alive for the benevolent Monarchy- and World gov't inevitably comes first --it is only debateable if the Christians will be here for the whole show. JM

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (9296)	12/3/1999 12:05:00 AM
From: Fred Ragan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9818

Ron, For want of a stronger analogy; you are a hooligan in a bureaucrats clothing. Since when has dealing with protesters, angry or not, been justification for denying their civil rights to anyone? And police brutality? You justify it because of police stress? You are a dangerous man. Violent protest is a last resort. It is in no way justified at this meeting. Police brutality though is never an option. Nor is intimidation. This should be a wake up call to Americans. City and state government panicked at a relatively minor incident. What would they do with a serious incident? And who would they look to for advice? You? Ron.