Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : From A to Zeev" -- SI Sacks Zeev -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (653)	12/3/1999 2:52:00 PM
From: Jay Lowe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 708

Hi Zeev ... thanks for all your excellent contributions to the VLNC thread ... we're dancing in the aisles over there. ;-) How do you read the movement of ULBI and LITH? Are they just tracking in sympathy? Or ... what? I can't make any sense of it ... they seem to be tracking in proportion without news or substance ... certainly without substance for LITH. Comment?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (653)	12/4/1999 7:00:00 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Respond to of 708

<<Tim, my last post on VLNC was to buy on a break above $7 (which I did myself as well),>> Zeev, I couldn't find your post on the Valence thread to buy on a break above $7. Went back to Nov. 9th. Here's an excerpt from your last post: <<I.N., I would say that 90% of the time, the professional hedge funds succeed in their short positions. When they have a floorless on their side, it is like shooting fish in barrel.>> Message 11895482 Here you are (third to last post on Valence thread) calling for $5 stock price for the end of November posted on 11/11: <<I believe that under these circumstances, I think that the stock will slowly drift back to the low $5 toward the end of the month.>> Message 11891811 Here you are saying there wasn't any rush the day before Valence's first PO (fifth to last post on Valence thread): <<The fact that they did a partial conversion indicates to me that the end game "might" be close, but there is a difference between might and "is", and for my own I would rather wait to see the turn around first, I do not think there is any rush.>> Message 11868929 Here you are two days before Valence's first PO saying Valence was under tax loss selling: <<I.N., I think you are not taking into account the time of the year, we are into tax selling season for stock that have underperformed, and VLNC is in this class.>> Message 11864560 Zeev, I'm just looking for a little accuracy in your Valence claims maybe you can point out that break above $7 call...I'm sure it's there maybe it wasn't your last post? MJ