Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : India Coffee House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: EaglePutt who wrote (9881)	12/3/1999 9:19:00 AM
From: JPR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12475

What I mean is that maybe she had a sense of invincibility; a quality that perhaps develops from several bold moves.--Ref: Indira Gandhi's security It is possible that she had a sense of invincibility. Common sense dictates that she didn't use the sikhs as bodyguards, when she was chipping away the Sikh's holy shrine. More likely, in her mind she has gone so far into flushing out the militants from the Sikh temple by extraordinary means and to her, it didn't really matter, in a fatalistic sense, whether she lived or died for the cause. The cause to her was so important and of great import to the integrity of the nation, the primal fear for life didn't surface into her consciousness - or was just fleeting at best,- urging her to change the guard.