Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Koligman who wrote (73073)	12/3/1999 12:32:00 AM
From: rupert1	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 97611

John: Didn't Amazon announce an intention to use HWP servers instead of SUNW?

To: John Koligman who wrote (73073)	12/3/1999 8:07:00 AM
From: rudedog	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 97611

The LU deal was certainly a big win for SUN. That market is UNIX, big systems. CPQ has a play in that space via Alpha but the delay in getting Wildfire out the door probably cost them that deal as the Alpha TurboLasers are getting a little long in the tooth. As I pointed out to Jim Kelley, Gartner just released a study showing that the big SUN systems have poor reliability in the field, less than 98% and in some installations less than 94%. By contrast, CPQ's intel-based lines routinely get 99.5%, Alpha systems are 99.99%, and Himilaya systems (the gold standard for reliability) are 99.9999%. Putting that in perspective, a Himilaya user can expect only a few seconds a year of downtime for any reason, scheduled or unscheduled. An Alpha user may see 45 minutes or so over the course of a year. A ProLiant user in a clustered configuration may see an hour or two, unclustered perhaps as much as 2 days a year total downtime (much of that is due to the need to cycle NT servers for configuration changes...). A SUN UE10000 user, on the other hand, will experience between 7 and 21 DAYS a year of downtime. This is really a terrible number. It points to a big reliability weakness of the big SMP machines - the more stuff you have the more stuff there is to go wrong. That is just simple math - if a single system has an hour a year of downtime, a 32-way system will have 32 hours a year, a 64 way system will have 64 hours a year. Unless, like the Tandem systems, steps are taken to assure that failure of a component has no effect on system operation.