Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (16628)	12/3/1999 9:19:00 AM
From: kolo55	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Has Zeev capitulated yet? Zeev recommended to some people they should short the stock at 5 1/2. Has he recommended that they cover yet? Are you still waiting for your price target of "below 3" to buy in? Both these forecasts were made when the stock was 4 1/2. If you think these charges are "unfair" and "outdated", then I suggest you re-read the referenced post for your claims of my position. Paul

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (16628)	12/3/1999 11:01:00 PM
From: I. N. Vester	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Larry, your complete lack of humility is quite astonishing. You knew about CC once, but on the whole your entire view of Valence has already been completely invalidated and if you if you had even the smallest sliver of character you would be apologizing for all your many months of campaigning to convince investors that Valence was not making significant progress, was being subject to uncontrolled massive dilution, etc, etc, etc. You cite Paul K's original mistake about CC's intentions. Paul had the brains to reverse himself in time to buy in at the bottom. He bought roughly 200,000 shares at about $5. At $11 he's got a $1.4M profit. You're say he's a 'financial genius' in sarcasm. The joke is entirely on you and the biggest irony is you still don't get it! I know that Mooter has at least $1M profit. You will keep going on forever about how you once knew something that Paul didn't, but the fact is that any investor who listed to Paul is now showing profit even if they bought before CC forced the price down, let alone if they made 2.5 times buying when Paul called the bottom. You've been going on and on and on about how the stock is suffering from terrible dilution. Now the stock has just about tripled. Help me out, Larry, why is the market raising the valuation of this stock if it has suffered terrible dilution? Why is the tape going against you so badly Larry? Do you actually believe you know better than the market? This is a very big sickness of yours, Larry. You are an incredible ego-maniac with no shred of humility. You have no sense of shame. You keep insisting that you know more than the market, that you know more than those who already have millions in profit at these levels. They are all fools and you know better. I'm really sorry for anybody who has listened to you or let you effect their nerve so that they sold when they just needed to stick with their investment. What do you have to say to them Larry?