SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brian Malloy who wrote (35040)12/3/1999 2:56:00 AM
From: Sonny McWilliams  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Brian. I found this article a bit more interesting. I guess Forbes is too busy campaigning. gg.

cbs.marketwatch.com

I like this 2002/2003 tidbit if the mediation does not work out. Who knows what will happen by that time with Msft or "Lunux".

Sonny




To: Brian Malloy who wrote (35040)12/3/1999 7:35:00 PM
From: blankmind  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 74651
 
- Amazingly, in the judge's 200+ page diatribe, the word "illegal" never comes up

- nor does the phrase "broke the law" or anything like that appear

- I'm wondering if this could be another attempt on Jackson/Clintonista's part to force a resolution prior to an all out appeal?



To: Brian Malloy who wrote (35040)12/5/1999 5:27:00 PM
From: John F. Dowd  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Brian: I don't think Posner will see this kindly although he is of course just and advisor of course and unless this was his advice to DOJ. It would seem to me that this is just another poorly veiled threat to try and get MSFT to settle before the embarrassment of an Appeals reversal. If so it was clumsily done and it would indicate 2 things 1. The states are in disarray and don't even know what they want versus what they partner in crime DOJ would want 2. They have the cart before the horse. Now if Posner did not recommend this than they will be seen by the mediator as trying to mess with the process of mediation. If I were him and this wasn't my idea I would say to myself "I thought it was my job to bring this thing to an out of court concord if possible". Arrogance shoe is definitely on the DOJ foot on this one. JFD