Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (29951)	12/3/1999 11:49:00 AM
From: Tunica Albuginea	Respond to of 77400

Bill Vaughn, again very sorry sahib: I was referring to John Fowler's comment: " There was an interesting article on the front page of this morning's Wall Street Journal about how GM and Ford are focused on moving their purchasing, and sales, to the web. Not a mention of Cisco, but I believe it was one of the most bullish articles I have ever read for networking companies. " I assumed that a CSCO investment thread would be very interested in: a)" one of the most bullish articles I have ever read for networking companies. " b) " Not a mention of Cisco ", c) why CSCO was not mentioned? d) who then did get the GM contract and why if it was not CSCO? e) could it have been the big C as in " the Competition ". I suppose one could use the term " spamming for some unknown reason ", if one was not aware of these reasons. I hope that that is no longer the case, :) cheers TA Message #29952 from Bill Vaughn at Dec 3 1999 10:54AM No, it just looked like you were spamming Newbridge here for some unknown reason. They weren't even mentioned in the WSJ article, yet you felt compelled to include them in your headline. Then you post a two year old story as if it were breaking news.