Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (24493)	12/3/1999 4:45:00 PM
From: d. alexander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69762

Harry; a little puzzled here; can't find a gap at 1327. Do you have a date on that? Does seem rather far away, 100+ points. I was wondering if it would retrace to test the 13dma, around 1410. It's still above the downtrend from the last high, which is the first support (1425, give or take). >>>Betting on QQQ options for a near term correction: I had read this & wondered if it were deliberately ambiguous. ie, yes, options players are betting on a near-term correction - BUT frequently high put volume is taken by Schaeffer contrarians as bullish! This time, they don't say. Best of both worlds. Thanks for Ike's bond comments. It reminds me of a stumble in my efforts to get educated. Friend of my ex is a long-time, successful & affluent commodities trader on the west coast (he still uses the phone). A couple of year's ago, thinking I might get some feedback on what it meant & what he thought, I sent him one of Ike's posts. I was also trying to point out what great things were to be found on the internet. Not only didn't get any feedback, I almost haven't heard from him since. Have always wondered about that <g> Will try to have a look at the lights myself. Nose to the monitor(s) Dorothy