SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (64983)12/3/1999 8:43:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 108807
 
Yes, a valid point but its more of an indication of how desperate these "wacko" groups can be. Somebody owns an old growth forest by virtue of history, where private ownership was allowed before regulation. Now he wants to chop it all down. What alternative is there for the protestors? When something should be public property, but isn't?

Come on, even you have got to admit clear-cutting an old growth forest to clean up one individual's junk bond debt from a failed savings and loan is a bad idea long term!



To: Bill who wrote (64983)12/4/1999 8:31:00 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
See, that is a good example of my problem. I have not shopped at the Gap for several years, nor have I ever bought Nike, so some of it is that some issues have never come up. But beyond that, I did not know anything about the Gap being the subject of a boycott call. Now, I find out that it is in order to get at a shareholder, not the company? Faggedaboudid.........


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News