Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gameboy who wrote (56026)	12/3/1999 11:58:00 PM
From: Tomas	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 95453

Crude Oil, Natural Gas Prices Switch Directions over Past Six Months Knight-Ridder Tribune Business News, December 1 For those who believe that the energy business is easy, consider how the price environment for crude oil and natural gas has changed in the past six months. At the end of March, crude oil prices dropped below the $15-per-barrel level that producers -- and their bankers -- say is necessary to make a profit. And the once-proud Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries was drawing worldwide ridicule for its inability to enforce production quotas. Natural gas, freed from international influences on its market, was meanwhile cruising along around $2.50 per million British thermal units, well above the profit line for U.S. producers. The price of natural gas would eventually reach $3 per million Btus by the end of summer. So energy company executives were happy to assure stockholders at their spring annual meetings that they needn't fear, that Texas energy companies now weighted their reserves about 65 percent to 70 percent in natural gas and only about 30 percent in crude oil. Investors, accordingly, pushed energy stocks to 52-week highs. But fast-forward to November, and OPEC is behaving as if it's 1973 again. Six months of newfound discipline among its nation-producers have almost doubled crude prices, to above $25 per barrel, enough to make economists worry about the effect that oil prices could have on inflation. And at the same time, Christmas shoppers in Chicago and Boston are moving about in shirtsleeves, courtesy of a warm weather spell that has pushed natural gas prices down by 9 percent and energy stocks well off of their 52-week highs. "Last spring, you could have won a bet by asking almost every fund manager where would they rather be, oil or gas?" said Bruce Lazier, analyst with San Jacinto Securities in Dallas. "Gas was the obvious answer to everybody in the industry." Lazier compares the experiences of Dallas-based Triton Energy Corp. to those of Cross Timbers Oil Co. and Union Pacific Resources Group, both of Fort Worth. Triton has kept the bulk of its assets in oil and even uses "OIL" as its stock ticker symbol. Union Pacific Resources and Cross Timbers Oil Co., its name not withstanding, have weighed their reserves in favor of natural gas. Since mid-September, Triton's stock has doubled, to a close of $24 per share in trading yesterday. UPR, meanwhile, has dropped from $18.50 to $13.06. And Cross Timbers has fallen from $13.50 to $10.18. "And Union Pacific Resources and Cross Timbers are both excellent, well-managed companies that we like a lot," Lazier said. "It just shows that the market can be fickle." Indeed, analyst David Garcia of Everen Securities in Houston advised investors suffering from natural gas price-shock to "take an aspirin, wait two weeks, and things may very well be better." Garcia said the energy markets are "too fixated on daily price fluctuations," which he said distort what has been a significant longer-term improvement in natural gas markets. "A year ago, we were looking at a price plateau of $1.90-$2.00 per million Btus for natural gas," he said. "Now the plateau is in the $2.40-$2.50 range. Garcia said that, industrywide, "conditions are better than at any time in the last 15 years. U.S. and worldwide demand are both strong with no signs of a letup and producers have worked off the huge overhangs from the market." But as Garcia notes, the new reality for energy companies and their investors is that the big fund managers have other places to put their money. "The fund manager who wants a 30 to 40 percent return on investment can put money into a dot-com stock and not have to worry about a warm spell up north," Garcia said. Ron Gist, who follows natural gas prices for Purvin & Gertz of Houston, said the National Oceanographic Service prediction last month of a warmer-than-usual winter has knocked the air out of the natural gas market. But he said market psychology through the summer, when natural gas prices were pushed to a nine-year high of $3 per million Btus, was also flawed. "There was a determination to have a bullish market for natural gas, and we now can see that was overdone," Gist said. "We forget that production capacity is higher than ever, and that a lot of gas can be stored in underground caverns, depleted oilfields and even packed-in pipelines."

To: Gameboy who wrote (56026)	12/5/1999 12:24:00 AM
From: Pete Young	Respond to of 95453

My opinion is that the drop in crude was orchestrated by big oil to bail out Asia and stabilize global markets. I am thinking the same thing. I wonder if there is a quid pro quo, ie; OPEC helps stimulate a faltering world economy with really low prices on energy, then, when the recovery comes, OPEC gets to increase prices to take their profit -and incidentally help stabilize world markets by applying the same kind of effect as an interest rate hike would. There is historical evidence for this kind of arrangement; just look at the history of the '71-74 hikes in oil. (source: M.A. Adelman "The Genie out of the Bottle" CH5: "Price Breakout, 1971-1974) Substantial excess supply existed from 71'-72', but OPEC was able to raise prices from about $5/b to $55/b (1987 dollars, ME light, spot). The U.S. Govt. gave the nod to diverting more dollars to clients like S.A. via higher oil prices, rather than having to go to Congress for foreign aid. Due to the mechanics of the market, and the political climate in the non-aligned world and Gulf, they lost control of the process, briefly--before reigning in the sheiks. It can be argued that the spike in prices did cause considerable damage to the world economy,--and the demand side of the oil market because of all the efficiency improvements that suddenly became economic. I don't think OPEC/Mexico/Norway will make the same mistake again. The world has changed, the oil market has changed. Many of the efficiency technology elephants have been shot on the demand side, futures markets control prices. OPEC has serious ongoing bills to pay, and has experienced the devastating effects of too low energy prices in the near term. We may see a reasonably high, and stable price for oil going forward.