Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Green who wrote (35546)	12/4/1999 12:16:00 AM
From: Glenn Norman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Yo_Sea Gull Don Green........ Re:I guess considering the MANY months of delays that would make sense, but the real problem is, LACK of DEMAND, for Rambus the stock. Would you guess the MANY months of delay has anything to do with the current LACK of DEMAND for RAMBUS stock? WOULDYA? HUH? HUH? WOULDYA? Welll, GOLLLEEEEEE GEE WHILLIKERS, why didn't I think of THAT!!!!!!!!! Salude to all the "BUSSERS", I'm going to bed and leave the "Sea Gull" killing to someone with a little more patience to put up with this crap - Norman.

To: Don Green who wrote (35546)	12/4/1999 10:49:00 PM
From: Matrix_Man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

You are right Don, there does seem to be a lack of demand for the RMBS shares right now. However, for the last few days anyway, that seems to pretty well balanced with a lack of supply of them. Volume is low to average at best. Even a small amount of buying seems to send it up a couple bucks - likewise a small amount of selling sends it down. I certainly cannot predict this stock, but I have the feeling that we won't go much lower, that we won't close below 70, baring any disasterous news. I believe that once machines start shipping, this stock will start a long, slow, ascent, very uncharacteristic of its past, and only breakout to new highs sometime next year once they start showing earnings. Boy, I hope I am wrong about that one, though ;o)