To: Sawdusty who wrote (20989 ) 12/4/1999 8:53:00 PM From: bully Respond to of 25548
LAKE ELSINORE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 1,............. 1999--Medinah Mining, Inc. reports the Phase 2 diamond-drilling program of the Company's gold-copper discovery zone at Alto de Lipangue near Santiago, Chile is commencing. Gordon House, P.Geo., reports that the access road to the project area has been upgraded and the drill sites for the first three recommended drill holes have been prepared. I hope the first three Drill holes don't look like the following drill holes, but only time will tell EH ? Here are a few excerps from this drill program that was conducted by a "group" in times gone by, I omitted all names of participants from this information circular as most are aware of those details. "BULLY"! Starburst Energy Corp - Starburst Energy Corp SBR Shares issued 3,603,181 1899-12-30 close $0 Tuesday Apr 10 1984 Effective at the opening of trading on Wednesday, April 11, 1984, trading in the shares of the Company will be suspended.as made because the management of the Company did not adhere to the Exchange's timely disclosure policy and published misleading information concerning the results of mineral exploration work being conducted on the Company's "Sleepy Hollow Claims" located near Wenatchee, Washington. For further information, please refer to the Exchange's Supplementary Notice dated April 9, 1984, a copy of which is available from the Exchange Listings Department. Trading in the Company's shares will remain halted for the duration of today's trading session. This Supplementary Notice supplements the Exchange Notice dated April 10, 1984. 1. No timely disclosure release publicly announcing the material facts relating to the Company's proposed participation in explorating for minerals on the Sleepy Hollow Claims ("Claims") was made by the Company in late March, 1983. 2. No timely disclosure release publicly announcing the material facts of the Company's termination of its proposed participation in exploring for minerals on the Claims was made by the Company in late May, 1983. 3. No timely disclosure release publicly announcing the material facts of its proposed participation in exploring for minerals on the Claims was made by the Company in or about September, 1983, at a time when its common shares were in the course of primary distribution. 4. The letter dated October 31, 1983, to the Company's shareholders, omitted the material fact that drilling on the first hole had been terminated due to continued caving and poor core recovery. 5. The Company's News Release dated November 24, 1983 was misleading because: (a) the abandonment and results of the drilling on the first drill hole were omitted; (b) the statement that core from the first hole had been "submitted for assay" was incorrect (core from that hole had not been, and never was, submitted to assay); and (c) the results of assays conducted on the "cuttings" taken during the drilling of the second hole, were omitted. Those results were: INTERVAL OZ TON/SILVER OZ GOLD/TON 155-190 .18 .003 190-220 .06 .003 220-250 .05 .012 250-280 .06 .020 280-310 .07 .012 310-340 .20 .054 6. The Company's News Release dated December 7, 1983 was misleading because: (a) the Cumo Resources Ltd. announcement of the same date was not disclaimed or accurately corrected by the Company; (b) the statement that the three diamond drill holes were spaced "approximately 1,000 feet apart" was incorrect (the first two holes had been drilled from the same drill site, and the third hole was located about 800 feet away from the site of the first two holes); (c) the statement that "the three holes....had positive results" was incorrect (the only "results" which were available at that time were the results from the cuttings from the second hole referred to in subparagraph 5 (c) above); (d) the statement that "gold mineralization" had been "discovered in the previous core sections" was not correct because no assay results on core were available at that time; and (e) the abandonment and results of the drilling on the first hole were not disclosed. 7. The Company's Quarterly Report, dated May 9, 1983 did not contain the required disclosure relating to the proposed participation in exploring for minerals on the Claims. 8. The Company's Quarterly Report dated July 14, 1983 did not contain the required disclosure relating to the termination of its proposed participation. 9. The Company's Quarterly Report dated October 10, 1983 did not contain the required disclosure relating to the proposed participation or the progress of the work being conducted on the Claims.