Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: long-gone who wrote (45588)	12/5/1999 11:48:00 AM
From: IngotWeTrust	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116770

ON Topic: RH, Ur insistence that BM use anything resembling due diligence whether charity, gold equity, or technology flim-flam IPO is HITTING THE NAIL ON THE HEAD! I am CONSTANTLY AMAZED that even after all this time "together" in this little thread called SI-GPM, there are still those who haven't learned their lesson yet: i.e., if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. No one get's something for nothing, not even in this click and go world. No where am I reminded of that more than in this 'net kingdom where so much information is available for "free" only to find out later what the cost for clicking really is as one's email box fills with smut and spam. Why anyone in their right mind would want to support a "charity" or "not for profit, political agendae gold organization" of ANY kind without taking the corresponding, LEGITIMATE tax deduction is beyond your insistence they apply due diligence anyhow. In fact, I'm willing to bet BM has spent several hours clicking around that food site to try to compensate for whatever perception of damage done by the entire world's legitimate resistance to a 'sumpthun'fer nuthin' promo scam. No, click and go isn't for free...if there are cookies associated with it. CONSIDER THE MASTER's M.O. Bill Gate's pays $5 per name to get his hands on new eMail addresses. Now there's a man who understands "free clicks"... No, click and feed isn't for free...if there is no accountability on the receiving end of the clicker. Some day for the helluvit, I'd like to hear you share the logistics from your 25+ years of experience as a professional material handler, just what is involved in buying, shipping, receiving, storing and distribution of FREEfood incurred by LEGITIMATE charities already scrutinized and scrubbed clean from years of exposure to the public, the tax man, and the phalanx of CPA...such as the Red Cross emergency food and shelter assistance during an disaster, big or little. Would be a very enlightening post from you, me thinks. Oh, and before I forget it, No, recycling gold--for $20 an ounce COST--like I regularly do and wrote a how-to-book, samples, and tester kit about it, is NOT free either.* No, building websites isn't free either. Anyone shocked I exchanged labor of one kind for labor of another yet to be collected??? Hell, Richard, this thread was inundated by Ron Reece posts blasting me to kingdom come who proceeded to point out the Pay to Play Blue Bucket Gold Diggings Trommel Runs have a cost associated with it, something which was NOT hidden. So, there are people on here who want it both ways. What else is new? I guess it is just the nature of all gold enamoured creatures, to believe in something for nothing. All I can figure as to the "why" is simply because the Good Lord once upon a time deposited gold in creeks,"FREE to the Finders" --- or was it? OH, and for a TRUE, NO-COOKIE viewing experience? Feel Free: members.aol.com <---the book distributor oregontrail.net <---the Blue Bucket Gold Mine Ole "paying my dues and retrieving what is "loose" -(or attached-or gold plated) fer as LOW COST as I CAN and watching the yeowling and howling on here about me with great amusement-especially by the Christians and brotherly/sisterly love advocates in which we are knee deep around here..., especially at this Holiday Season --/49r

To: long-gone who wrote (45588)	12/5/1999 1:53:00 PM
From: Bobby Yellin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116770

you are really hung up on the clintons aren't you.. I had asked you to provide evidence when you wrote the the European central bankers said there was no more gold leasing.. when all the news releases said the contrary..what has that to do with Hillary? I did provide another bona fide site which mentioned the website and mentioned press releases about it in major newspapers.. you have repeated that you don't care about this or that or that or this.. Richard I am assuming I was on this thread way before you came with your baggage..I asked Tom to start this thread, not realizing that it would digress into Richard's forum of conspiracy and hating the government thread..not realizing it would lead Rose into the lowest depths, not realizing it would allow Doug to post proprietary information,not realizing it would become a scapegoat thread,not realizing it would create antisentiment against hedging by companies, not realizing it would be used as a platform to scapegoat people whose style not content other people found offensive, not realizing that it would allow people with a minus track record to bash others with a pretty good track record,etc THE TRULY LUDICROUS EVENT THAT SUMS UP THE DETERIORATION OF THIS THREAD IS WHEN I POSTED A SITE THAT MIGHT HELP HUNGRY KIDS the demons from Pandoras box were in full sight :-)

To: long-gone who wrote (45588)	12/5/1999 9:40:00 PM
From: Zardoz	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 116770

Richard you said: "btw I said, USE THE TERM - OT -!" Was it not the IMF that wanted to revalue gold so that excesses could be used to help more poverty stricken countries? How is feeding the hungry really off topic. More to the point, what determines what is on topic on this thread? Y2K isn't on topic, Clinton isn't on topic, Black helicopters over your house aint on topic. And the most recent posts of yours aren't on topic either. You're using this as your political weapon against the society! Which one of these recent posts use that covenanted OT symbols that you suggest others should? #reply-12194687 #reply-12194759 #reply-12194768 #reply-12194814 #reply-12194831 In my opinion, ALL are off topic. Hutch.