Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : How To Write Covered Calls - An Ongoing Real Case Study! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Herm who wrote (12009)	12/6/1999 5:08:00 PM
From: jaytee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14162

Herm: Can you share your view for WHAT IS A: 1) MAX. P/E that is acceptable to you (in general) when you give a quick "look-see" at a prospect? 2) MIN. GROWTH % that will make a stock worth further investigation Your 2 posts , re/ WAG and NSM indicate that you COMPARE THEM to their individual sectors, but obviously, just because an issue is "only" 4% premium for PE over the others does not mean it bodes well. (too high to begin with, I assume?) And, the GROWTH of "only" 16% (WAG and NSM) does not appear to be remotely close to your requirements (right?) Once again, you're shining a (much needed) "fundamental" light on the picture for me. I would appreciate your response to these 2 areas (max p/e min. % growth) so that I don't continue bumbling in the "dark" on prospects that my T/A (by itself) may dig up. TIA jaytee P.S. what about PEG as a measuring tool?