Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dale Baker who wrote (5293)	12/5/1999 12:36:00 PM
From: pz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Dale, <<<The sheer volume of pathetic lying touts that show up here on the long side is amazing. Hucksterism is a good word for it.>>> Uhhhh Dale...you might want to go read the GUMM thread and look at the SHEER VOLUME of Wexler's posts the last couple of days. I'd certainly call him a SHORT SHILL and he's a pathetic lying shill. Bill wouldn't know the truth if it bit him in the butt. Paul

To: Dale Baker who wrote (5293)	12/5/1999 5:44:00 PM
From: John Curtis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

ROFLMAO!! "Trust me, Bill isn't going to bother with your little schoolyard challenges." Funny how my attempts to get at the heart of his lying and spreading of false information is somehow construed by you as "schooyard". By comments such as that you must know you're not painting a particularly great portrait of yourself. Still, more to the point, I don't expect him to respond because he CAN'T RESPOND. In this particular instance he's exposed himself as a fool and a liar. And also a coward to boot since he continues to allow such as you to respond for him. But it's been fun here while it lasted. Note I will not respond to anyone other than Mr. Bill from this point forward. As a consequence I expect there to be a loooong silence. Good luck with whatever investment strategy you chose to employ. John~