To: Mike Buckley who wrote (12096 ) 12/5/1999 7:51:00 PM From: Uncle Frank Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
Sorry for the delay in responding, Mike, but I had a 4 hour battle with a 20 year old juniper bush that didn't want to relocate to the recycling pile. It was close, but I won <g>.I'm challenged But not by lances at 4 paces. I'll try to justify why I had the temerity to disagree with my teacher, Mike sama. From page 7 of the original Gorilla Game:First of all, it is not the bits and bytes that make high tech so special, so you don't have to be technical to understand what is going on <this rules out any more "capetologist" excuses >. Instead , as we will explain the detail in the next chapter, it is the discontinuous innovations that make the difference. Innovation is a concept we are all familiar with - new stuff makes us happy, we buy it, sellers sell it, it's called an economy. Discontinuity is the new idea. It means not compatible with the existing systems. Now that we've got a common framework, let's go by the numbers:1) Requires that end users not have the ability to maintain program software of their choice on their personal hard disks. Other personal-choice issues are denied. I believe a "fat" computer can be used within the networker-as-server model as easily as a "thin" one. If this long ballyhooed approach ever generates a substantial market, I suspect a large portion of the users will keep their old computers until they die of natural causes. Thus, they will have the choice of keeping some individualized software on their own hard drives. 2) Requires that the IT department deploy and maintain fat server-thin client configurations instead of continuing with the status quo of networked fat PCs. Again, your assumption is that fat PCs won't be eligible for inclusion in the new system. IT departments have supporting clients' software needs through central servers for many years. All that's happening is the server will be feeding the client via the Internet.3) Requires that entirely new value chains be developed with regard to bandwidth, dump pipes, smart pipes, and virtually everything associated with getting the apps from the server to the end user. I see making fatter pipes as a continuous innovation.Moore also agrees with Luke in his assessment that the emotional changes are dramatic enough to be considered an aspect of the discontinuous nature. I can't immediately document where he wrote about it but I'm reasonably certain that I didn't dream about it. It might have been in Tornado instead of Game. Mike, I'm sure you read it, but I'd like to review it "in context". Please provide a reference. Note: I have all 4 of Moore's works in my library, but I haven't read 3 of them yet.Emotional willingness to embrace the changes are significant aspects of discontinuous innovations. The discontinuous innovation is a stand alone occurrence. Emotional willingness to embrace the changes only determines its rate of adoption. jmho uf