SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ironyman who wrote (45629)12/6/1999 9:39:00 AM
From: lorne  Respond to of 116790
 
Volatility rules in gold
smh.com.au



To: Ironyman who wrote (45629)12/6/1999 9:44:00 AM
From: Enigma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116790
 
Eric - I think people must be selling the physical in spades, or paper representing the physical. This is the fourth day in a row at least where the London action has set the tone before NY. We're told that daily trading in London is huge - I guess only the insiders have a clue as to who is actually selling and who is buying - there seems to be no commentary available on the inner workings of the daily gold market in London. Buyers are holding off for a bottom. Maybe some had a whiff of the Dutch sale announcement in advance - so we may see a recovery today - so who knows.

If the Dutch sale was part of the agreement among the 15 CBs why was it not announced at the time in the interest of full disclosure?



To: Ironyman who wrote (45629)12/6/1999 1:38:00 PM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 116790
 
<<Your pork bellies were only down .60 for the week and jumped 2.40 on the open today. Gold is being kicked hard, yet no one I know is selling the physical.>>
Remember, In the past 2-4 days after the bellies have moved, gold went up. based on overnite down, timing might be about right.



To: Ironyman who wrote (45629)12/7/1999 6:42:00 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 116790
 
Hey Irony,
the move close enough?
kitco.com