SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lorrie coey who wrote (63074)12/6/1999 10:42:00 AM
From: Scarecrow  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 67261
 
It [i.e. rape] comes with the territory.
You must really work hard to come up with rationales and justifications for Clinton's behavior. You are a gold medalist in goading people but an also-ran when it comes to logic. However, surely you can do better than this. Rape is all part and parcel of being a politician -- so therefore, Clinton didn't do anything wrong with Juanita Broadrick? So, why run Packwood out of town? He didn't rape -- only groped and kissed. And, heck, Clarence Thomas -- by agreement of accuser and accused ("J'accuse"???) didn't even touch anyone -- but nearly lost his career.

think T.nugent has ever "forced himself" on a Female?
1. Don't know.
2. Don't care.
3. Last I checked, he was a washed-up gonzo rocker/hunting activist -- not the alleged leader of the free world sworn to uphold and defend the laws of the country. Maybe -- *maybe* -- you can see the difference. Oh, heck, what am I saying!
4. So, whatever a gonzo rocker does should set the bar for the bahavior of the country's chief executive. Interesting theory. Could you find three (non-stoned, non-drunk, non-high) voting-age adults in the country to agree with that?

Now, in response, please make sure you post some type of non-sequitir definition that surely must be some type of coded message to your mothership...

(HEY, here's an idea: post the definition to "non-sequitir"! -- Boy! That'd be daffy and funny all at once...)



To: lorrie coey who wrote (63074)12/6/1999 10:58:00 AM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
MsBrodderick should have gone to the Police with the Evidence.

It was (and is ) Mrs. Brodderick.

Things were radically different 20 years ago for vulnerable women who were raped by powerful men. That was one of the rationales for the feminist revolution. Read some of their propaganda some day.