Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: engineer who wrote (3964)	12/6/1999 3:54:00 PM
From: Patrese	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13582

Hello Engineer, I have questions regarding certain issues that perhaps you can help me on. 1) Re HDR, an MSNBC article stated that implementation of HDR by a wireless provider would come at the expense of voice-only customer capacity for that provider. This implies CDMA frequencies are licensed by the FCC a la TDMA or other radio spectrum licenses, and therefore total bandwith (throughput) is finite in capacity for a given provider. Is this the case? I was under the impression CDMA used low power, unregulated frequency that were essentially there for the taking by whoever put up the appropriate infrastructure. 2) Assuming (never for one second forgetting the consequences of assuming....) MSNBC is correct, how many voice customers are equivalent to a 2MB/sec HDR signal in the frequency space. 3) Re Cisco's stationary wireless technology, Vofdm, does this tech. use CDMA licenses from Qualcomm in its design? Many, many, many thanks.

To: engineer who wrote (3964)	12/6/1999 4:01:00 PM
From: w molloy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13582

The shape of Q to come? (from the ARMHY thread) To: +Michael (266 ) From: +Michael Monday, Dec 6 1999 1:36PM ET Reply # of 267 eb-mag.com INDUSTRY LEADERS PILLARS OF HIGH TECH Towering over the industry, EB's pillars of 1999 By Russ Britt and Tam Harbert Redwoods tower over other sorts of trees, but they stand shoulder to shoulder with other redwoods. So too for EB's CEO of the Year. Koichi Nishimura of Solectron Corp. shares the spotlight with our pillars of the high-tech industry--Robin Saxby, Steve Kaufman, Steve Jobs, Scott McNealy and Craig Barrett. Here is a quick wrap on these five giants. All are worthy of industry accolades, yet all face on-going challenges as they continue to grow their companies and make them stand tall in an ever-changing landscape. 32-bit royalty Robin Saxby, chairman and CEO of ARM Holdings PLC, Cambridge, England, has become a high-tech king in Britain for creating a Silicon-Valley-like company whose stock has soared in the public markets (see Electronic Business, November 1999, page 52). But in global semiconductor circles, the admiration stems more from the way he did it. Saxby helped create a new business model in the chip industry, that of licensing intellectual property (in this case a 32-bit reduced instruction set computing (RISC) microprocessor design) rather than manufacturing chips or hiring a foundry to manufacture them. Instead, ARM relies on more than 30 semiconductor partners to refine the design and make chips targeted at specific OEM markets, including everything from cell phones to anti-lock braking systems in cars. In addition to license fees, ARM earns a royalty every time an ARM-based chip ships. Recognizing the lucrative nature of this business model, the financial markets have capitalized ARM at more than $7 billion as of mid-November, even though analysts estimate that it will report less than $100 million in revenues in 1999. But Saxby has a daunting management task over the next five years. His company is growing at a breakneck pace. For a company that sells intellectual property, smart people are crucial. Saxby estimates that he has to add at least 100 employees a year (present head count is about 400) to keep up with the growth. He's already having a hard time finding enough people, and it could get worse. Saxby has said that a key to ARM's success has been open and direct communication. Keeping that communication free flowing, within the company and with its increasing number of partners, will be difficult as the company evolves from a small, close-knit group of engineers to a larger corporation with several layers of management. Saxby recognizes these challenges. He doesn't feel threatened by other companies licensing processor cores, he says. Rather, the biggest threat to ARM is ARM itself. "The threat is our ability to implement," he says. --Tam Harbert