Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nihil who wrote (65563)	12/7/1999 8:59:00 AM
From: pezz	Respond to of 108807

The dinosaurs dominated the mammals. The mammals didn't get smarter. They were the same at the end of the dinosaurs period of dominance as they were at the beginning . << genome needs to survive, not dominate>> They survived but just barely and not at the expense of the dinosaurs. And only because they were of no competition to the dinosaurs. Survival of the fittest means a whole hierarchy of the fittest and the mammals were at the bottom while the dinosaurs were at the top. They had one hundred and fifty million years to demonstrate their superiority. They failed miserably . Once the dinosaurs were gone [due in no way to mammal intelligence ] It only took sixty million years for humans to dominate all other mammals with intelligence .