Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HairBall who wrote (52841)	12/7/1999 12:02:00 AM
From: Summit X	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

LG: Sorry to see you are getting abused so. With respect to QCOM I am longer than a hippies hair in the late 60s, and expect to stay that way for some time. As for the general thread community - I can't understand why the aggressive nature towards those who short. As was posted previously today by another (sorry, memory short, I live in B.C.) 'shorts' are merely fodder for the long term longs. Good luck to your position, and to the longs. You did state you haven't traded for a loss in the Q. Is that truly so? I know I trade it daily plus my core which isn't touched, and 75% of the time I'm positive, however I did get laid out heavy last time it broke $400 (three weeks ago??). Anyways I thought you got hammered last time you shorted and posted in public here (about 1-2 months ago) but perhaps I am wrong. Lord knows I am wrong >+ 49% of the time, else I wouldn't have to worry about my trades at all. If it works for you, run with the ball. I'll be on team 'long' myself. Best, SX.