Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tekboy who wrote (12268)	12/7/1999 12:44:00 PM
From: gdichaz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 54805

tekboy. As usual, you have gotten to the key point (after a little preliminary stuff naturally) Quote. So the question isn't really "should we exclude all discussion of non-G&Ks," but rather, "just how much discussion should there be of potential G&Ks." I would answer "some but not much, increasing in proportion to the potential significance of the technology in question and the proximity of full G&K status." Unquote. Agreed. Over and out on "shiny pebbles" Now lets turn our attention to a much more important area : LindyBill's idea of an in depth discussion of kings and near kings. Ready, set, go........................ Cha2 PS Note: While I would be very happy to take credit for post #833, the poster was Mike Buckley. He did refer to me (as Chaz) within the post, but he is the one who brought the Q to this thread's attention as a serious gorilla candidate.