SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (65804)12/7/1999 3:18:00 PM
From: jbe  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 108807
 
Could we possibly stick to subjects that were brought up on this thread?

Personally, I don't see any point in dragging over here old arguments from other threads, particularly since most of the rest of us don't know (and I would presume to say don't care) what the who-shot-John was all about in the first place.

(In case Bill Vaughn is listening: not an attempt at censorship, Bill...just an appeal to common sense.)



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (65804)12/8/1999 10:17:00 AM
From: Bill  Respond to of 108807
 
<<you can dish it out but you can't take it. >>

This statement is posted often on SI (not just from you), but I never really could see the point. It is really kind of a silly thing to say since the target of the accusation usually does in fact "take it" and he usually fires back a similar one line flame. Seems that each time this statement is used, both sides are dishing and taking at the same time.

It's a useless cliche, wouldn't you agree?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News