SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Phoenix who wrote (11542)12/7/1999 8:26:00 PM
From: SurfForWealth  Respond to of 21876
 
Hello everyone, This article explains the latest on the OFDM alliance situation. Looks like LU & Wi-LAN are getting cosy! LOL This could likely play a large role in this company going forward as it promises to be a huge sector. A unanimous alliance with all the key players in the many applications for this technology would be the best thing for all IMO. Cheers!!!
1 13:41 =DJ Wi-LAN Says OFDM Alliance Could Take Two Months >T.WIN
By Scott Adams

TORONTO (Dow Jones)--If a new alliance around orthogonal frequency division
multiplexing is going to take shape, it could take about "two months" to form,
as long as there are no "wrenches" thrown into the process along the way, said
Wi-LAN Inc. (T.WIN) chairman, president and chief executive Hatim Zaghloul.
Last week, various industry participants, including a Cisco Systems Inc.
(CSCO) representative, attended a meeting in California to discuss harmonizing
OFDM wireless communication industry standards, Zaghloul said. A Cisco
spokeswoman had said a few days before the Wi-LAN meeting that no Cisco
representative would attend.
The meeting was organized by Wi-LAN and its partner Philips Semiconductor, a
unit of Philips Electronics Ltd. (X.PHE). Wi-LAN has a Wideband-OFDM technology,
while Cisco formed its own alliance around its Vector-OFDM technology.
Zaghloul said Wi-LAN hasn't been dictating that it wants its W-OFDM technology
to become a standard. "We're not trying to push W-OFDM. W-OFDM's beauty right
now in the industry arena is that Wi-LAN never proposed it. It's the sort of
natural progression of the industry... Lucent, the biggest player in the
wireless arena, is the one who proposed it," he said. Past experience shows that
one company shouldn't try to impose standards on an industry, he said. "We need
the whole industry to move forward."
"One of the purposes of the alliance should be to clear up...any intellectual
property issues," Zaghloul said.
Zaghloul declined to speculate which companies would be part of the new OFDM
alliance. He said a new alliance could still include Cisco and the partners that
joined the Cisco-led OFDM alliance. Some of the Cisco alliance members attended
Wi-LAN's meeting last week, he said.
Zaghloul said it is still Wi-LAN's opinion that Cisco's V-OFDM technology
violates Wi-LAN's W-OFDM patent.
"V-OFDM and W-OFDM aren't mutually exclusive," he said. "It is Wi-LAN's view
right now that, in all likelihood, Cisco uses W-OFDM and just uses multiple
antennas on top of it. So it is not W-OFDM or V-OFDM. V-OFDM is a variation of
W-OFDM (in Wi-LAN's opinion)," Zaghloul said.
In the past, Cisco has said that it doesn't believe its V-OFDM technology
infringes on any Wi-LAN patents.
-Scott Adams, Dow Jones Newswires; 416-306-2026;
scott.adams@dowjones.com

(END) DOW JONES NEWS 12-07-99
01:41 PM- - 01 41 PM EST 12-07-99