Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gpowell who wrote (17677)	12/8/1999 1:24:00 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29970

I think that even outwardly contemplating such actions in concert would be in violation of officers' contracts, and contrary to ATHM's charter (but what do I know, I never read it) especially by those who hold office and are charged with fiduciary responsibilities to the parents. I would think that officers would be liable for civil infringements. Unless they were given a free hand at it in writing. Which wouldn't surprise me at this stage. What do others have to say on this? Can ATHM officers legally consider pursuing alternatives, to the extent of evaluating them for supplanting their communal parents in a manner that would stand up in court?