Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (53118)	12/11/1999 6:12:00 PM
From: Kayaker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

that Cramer is a...moron his Street.com adds zero value if anything, it provides negative value JW, The Street.com isn't that bad. I don't read Cramer because his investment style is vastly different from mine, and because his track record is lousy. Most of the other folks I don't read either. But there articles that make the $99/yr well worth it. I find Justin Lahart's articles to be some of the best anywhere when I'm looking for an overall impression of the market. For example... The Coming Week: The Bulls Keep Running, and Things Get Frothier -- By Justin Lahart -- Associate Editor 12/10/99 7:17 PM ET Jeff Applegate, the Lehman Brothers strategist whose 80% stock allocation has led him to regularly top best-blend lists, may be Wall Street's best spokesman for the idea of the new economy.... thestreet.com I also have a lot of respect for Jim Seymour who has been an editor at PC Magazine since the early 80s. I had a subscription to PC Magazine for more than a decade and I know Jim Seymour knows the computer industry. He was an early forecaster of the potential of Qwest with his article back in 98 (?). I got into QWST after reading it and made enough $$$ to pay for the next 100 years of Street.com subscriptions. They also did an article many moons ago on RFMD before most folks (I) had even heard of it. Again I made enough from that investment to pay for at least 100 years of subscriptions. So, although I'm not a big fan of Cramer, or even the majority of the site, I find it a bargain at $99 a year.